On December 3, 2010, at 18:00, at the Council Hall of St. Salvatore Telesino, there was a city council to debate upon the following agenda:
1. Reading and approval of meeting minutes November 18, 2010.
2. Observations Provincial Territorial Coordination Plan.
3. Contact Planning City Urban Planning.
4. Regulatory approval for the installation and operation of radio-telephony and telecommunications.
5. Adoption Rules economic assistance to contrast extreme poverty.
For all items on the agenda would take up the role of the population, unless the convening of a council open. Instead, the site of the City warning was published just two days before the city council and, again only two days before, were posted a few A4 leaflets on notice boards in the country and some bars.
In particular, the new procedure regarding the PUC, initiated by the previous municipal administration, after more than a year of silence, is suddenly taken by convening a council to approve the (new?) Orientations. Meanwhile, meetings with citizens and associations, despite promises and assurances, not even the shadow.
even see the environmental sought by the administration itself, made up of citizens and particularly interested in environmental issues and eco-friendly development of our territory, was not informed by the council, whereas, in our view, should also be directly involved in the definition of orientations .
consultation for environmental protection is in fact just born with the aim of " expand and enrich the information on the state of 'environment in the city, improve the use land, protect the environment and natural resources, promote sustainability and promote the welfare of the community "and would therefore be an important venue for discussion and exchange of information between parties with the purpose of protecting the environment and nature and the city administration, supporting inter alia, the protection and enhancement of natural resources, safeguarding biodiversity, sustainable mobility, in the defense of the territory, to improve the quality air and water and water saving, pollution control acoustic and electromagnetic and development of alternative energy sources and energy conservation: all issues that will certainly see the PUC the main instrument to be addressed.
So why the visit was not involved in stage, most important, to define the orientations of the PUC, nor has been advised of the forthcoming local council?
And why was not expected to seek support even for the drafting of the "Regulations for the installation and operation of telephone and radio communications?
Then you need to see this?
The consultation, in view of our directors was created to make an effective contribution or for other purposes?
We had criticized the previous administration for the way in which it was organized the first public meeting on the new PUC: Eng. Ferrigno, after a brief presentation of the guidelines of the PUC, he asked those present if they agree with what he had advertised and if there were comments. Of course at that time no one could 'say much, because it was necessary to first document.
But it was not possible to start looking at some documents until after more than a year when, quite by chance, we know that at the municipal offices "lay" for some time the drafts of the new implementing rules and the new Building Regulations.
And once those considered implementing rules are shocked: it was the draft of those Telese Terme, where, precisely because of those standards, the speculation has irreparably destroyed a whole country!
However calmed us by saying that, they, would have completely revised and only after extensive participation.
But the suspect, and now has more than one suspect, is that despite having to perform a procedure dictated by the rules requiring the participation and sharing with the people, at least for the PUC in fact the participation and involvement, our administrators, beyond statements of fact, good for the electoral programs, are in fact to avoid or minimize, because today, as yesterday, especially on certain topics, not you want to open and it is considered that we must and we can continue to decide properly sealed in the "palace", the minority party on this occasion, for some reason, has decided not to inform the public of a 'apparent contradiction of the majority council.
0 comments:
Post a Comment