Can I Claim Insurance Without Police Report

San Salvatore Telesino: and participation? Combustion

On December 3, 2010, at 18:00, at the Council Hall of St. Salvatore Telesino, there was a city council to debate upon the following agenda:

1. Reading and approval of meeting minutes November 18, 2010.

2. Observations Provincial Territorial Coordination Plan.

3. Contact Planning City Urban Planning.

4. Regulatory approval for the installation and operation of radio-telephony and telecommunications.

5. Adoption Rules economic assistance to contrast extreme poverty.

For all items on the agenda would take up the role of the population, unless the convening of a council open. Instead, the site of the City warning was published just two days before the city council and, again only two days before, were posted a few A4 leaflets on notice boards in the country and some bars.

In particular, the new procedure regarding the PUC, initiated by the previous municipal administration, after more than a year of silence, is suddenly taken by convening a council to approve the (new?) Orientations. Meanwhile, meetings with citizens and associations, despite promises and assurances, not even the shadow.

even see the environmental sought by the administration itself, made up of citizens and particularly interested in environmental issues and eco-friendly development of our territory, was not informed by the council, whereas, in our view, should also be directly involved in the definition of orientations .

consultation for environmental protection is in fact just born with the aim of " expand and enrich the information on the state of 'environment in the city, improve the use land, protect the environment and natural resources, promote sustainability and promote the welfare of the community "and would therefore be an important venue for discussion and exchange of information between parties with the purpose of protecting the environment and nature and the city administration, supporting inter alia, the protection and enhancement of natural resources, safeguarding biodiversity, sustainable mobility, in the defense of the territory, to improve the quality air and water and water saving, pollution control acoustic and electromagnetic and development of alternative energy sources and energy conservation: all issues that will certainly see the PUC the main instrument to be addressed.

So why the visit was not involved in stage, most important, to define the orientations of the PUC, nor has been advised of the forthcoming local council?

And why was not expected to seek support even for the drafting of the "Regulations for the installation and operation of telephone and radio communications?

Then you need to see this?

The consultation, in view of our directors was created to make an effective contribution or for other purposes?

We had criticized the previous administration for the way in which it was organized the first public meeting on the new PUC: Eng. Ferrigno, after a brief presentation of the guidelines of the PUC, he asked those present if they agree with what he had advertised and if there were comments. Of course at that time no one could 'say much, because it was necessary to first document.

But it was not possible to start looking at some documents until after more than a year when, quite by chance, we know that at the municipal offices "lay" for some time the drafts of the new implementing rules and the new Building Regulations.

And once those considered implementing rules are shocked: it was the draft of those Telese Terme, where, precisely because of those standards, the speculation has irreparably destroyed a whole country!

However calmed us by saying that, they, would have completely revised and only after extensive participation.

But the suspect, and now has more than one suspect, is that despite having to perform a procedure dictated by the rules requiring the participation and sharing with the people, at least for the PUC in fact the participation and involvement, our administrators, beyond statements of fact, good for the electoral programs, are in fact to avoid or minimize, because today, as yesterday, especially on certain topics, not you want to open and it is considered that we must and we can continue to decide properly sealed in the "palace", the minority party on this occasion, for some reason, has decided not to inform the public of a 'apparent contradiction of the majority council.

How To Get Nice Tilt Lacrosse

zero and total recycling of matter: Province of Benevento 'virtuous'?

Since it was introduced the provincial level waste, a few months ago, no answer was given to the comments received from committees and associations, and no meeting is granted. The conference release of 12 November, when it was not planned, as usual, no citizen participation, has not clarified any doubts and inconsistencies in the plan. If possible, increase them.

Meanwhile, within and outside the province, this plan is advertised as an example of "another level possible," anti-incinerator and sustainable finally able to realize a virtuous waste management, taking as reference the model Vedelago.

Unfortunately, our province is not immune to the emergency, nor is managed in a more democratic and transparent. Despite the reassuring statements of virtuosity, and the triumphant tones about our situation than in Naples, our directors do not know or do not say what will happen starting next January 1, 2011. The final decree signed by Napolitano has not even been commented on by our administrators. The only information that leaked from the unique province of the President's meetings with former workers of the consortia that are pressing to be reabsorbed.

We ask once again to the Province (although now with skepticism) for an urgent meeting in order to provide the necessary clarifications about the actual feasibility of the plan (the only plan available to citizens and waste little more than a declaration of intent), both in terms of financial resources for the organization of the collection service by the SAMT from 1 January 2011.

There is apparent inconsistency between the provincial administration, which intends to stubbornly obtain waste management, while not actually show that they are ready, and the great silence of the local administrators that often, but timidly, expressed their disagreement to themselves be "managed", and prefer to wait for the evolution of events and hide behind such top-down.

We would especially that there was never explained how the Daneco continue to manage the pressing of Casalduni if \u200b\u200bthe Province has presented as its flagship model Vedelago.

The STIR of Casalduni, to say the person responsible Daneco facilities, will ensure improvements, but still continue to produce eco-bales or FOS, and certainly "will enhance" organic waste (with biodigester, blowing ... ) or send them to incineration, landfill sending "small quantities".

Vedelago However, since the system is an alternative to these techniques and tends to recycling and recovery of the materials, which provide a sense of STIR management that still remains hinged on the old unsustainable management of the integrated cycle?

The program proposed by Daneco is aligned to the old system, and continues to perpetrate the same approach, based on landfills and incinerators, which led us to the current disastrous situation. In this setting, a typical system Vedelago would not waste to be treated by extrusion (which is one of the key aspects that makes it attractive from the business point of view these plants), so we continue to mention it seems a mere publicity stunt.

If indeed the province would build a plant on the model Vedelago, should immediately start with actions aimed at reducing waste, especially difficult to treat a necessary precondition for easy retrieval of materials to be sent to the system. These actions, however, would be immediately possible at no cost, and have been widely announced in the Waste Plan, and will never materialize. Another complementary aspect to the model Vedelago is the presence of composting facilities and treatment of organic compost to be allocated for agriculture and gardening. But none of this is on the agenda.

The same

Daneco also manages the landfill Sant'Arcangelo, with disastrous results that everyone recognizes. Landfill needs to close and reclaim both the hydrogeological situation of the places in which it was made, it is dangerous for the continuing pollution it produces.

It can not be silent about this and encourage the populist revolt against waste "Neapolitan" to defend the territory of the agricultural economy Sannio, proclaiming false victories against spills, and the virtual that they will reach € 10 million for stabilization, while continuing to stress the need of the landfill to accept waste in the coming years, as stated in the provincial plan.

The environmental disaster of a landfill is perhaps the origin of the waste spread?

How to justify the repeated and costly clean-up, already previously proved useless in the absence of adequate monitoring and remediation? Although the landfill will receive only the waste of Sannio continue to be a bomb ecological disaster for the environment and the economy of our province.

The public, moreover, are still kept in the dark the quantity of the spill, the type and origin of the incoming waste.

access Countless acts have not had any effect, the mayor of St. Archie refuses even to receive the components of the local committee and the province, despite having held a ridiculous technical board, it behaves the same way.

How can you think and act like that and at the same time, present at conferences and debates as a political virtue, and even environmentally-conscious land of democracy?

We associations and committees want the closure of the landfill and not we are interested in the economic expectations of the Province for the safety, with more "piling" in order to prevent further landslides.

reiterate that if indeed Mrs. Poli Vedelago build the facility on the model, there would be no need of a dump, let alone so large.

In essence, the province of Benevento there is so very unlike the other provinces of Campania, and nothing serves the heartfelt populism with which they hypocritically try to defend the regional landfill from the inevitable spills.

The waste crisis occurs, As always, as democratic emergency.

Civic Committees of San Salvatore T. and S Guard. - Corer - Codisam

What Causes Rash And Blisters On A Baby's Bum

TAR Campania: CASE DISMISSED VOCEM

The Nov. 26 ruling was filed by which the Campania Regional Administrative Court has decided three appeals pending on the history of the project of the Company VOCEM to build a biomass plant / incinerator in the municipality of San Salvatore Telesino.
The first two actions (ie those of a community of love and Telesino San Salvatore and the province of Benevento against the release of the EIA positive response from the Campania region and VOCEM against that of the City of San Salvatore Telesino) were declared ineligible, while the use of VOCEM and the Province of Bergamo against the negative decision of the Conference of Services was dismissed as unfounded. Interesting
the reasons for the sentence. Basically the application was rejected because the project was not compatible VOCEM from urban point of view (... " It, therefore, decisive in this case the fact that the Administration regional - on the basis of the 'position mostly negative about the construction of "emerged within the conference services and in accordance with the provision art. 196, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree n.152/2006 - has decided to take over not only the negative opinion of the City of San Salvatore Telesino compliance planning the project, but also further negative opinion of same town on the existence of the conditions to make a variation to the planning instrument general ...).
not been evaluated by the administrative courts then even further complaints of lawyers VOCEM than the negative decision of the Conference of the Services which has denied permission.
against the decision of the TAR could VOCEM a further appeal to the State Council.
Recall also the VOCEM made subject to resubmit the project under Presidential Decree 387/2003.
expenses were compensated.